I’ve let this one slip because I’ve not really paid that much attention to anything that contains the name “Hovind” for a very long time, but I just read a post by PZ Myers which included a video response by Rebecca Watson to the remarkable comment by Darek Isaacs on Eric Hovind’s show that asks the poignant and thought-provoking question, “Well, if evolution is true and it’s just all about the male propagating their DNA, we had to ask hard questions like, well, is rape wrong?”
Rebecca, unsurprisingly, does a fine job of showing just how sturdy a question this is by using the same logic the question provides to question other important things, my favorite being “If Newton’s third law of motion is all about every action having an equal and opposite reaction, is it wrong to poop on a baby who just pooped on me?” Cutting edge thought, I’d have to say. But I still feel the need to address Isaacs’s question.
Dear Mister Atheist, I’m gonna tell you in three minutes why I’m a complete and utter idiot who clearly has no idea about the actual argument around evolution. I watched about the first half minute of this moron’s video and shut it off because it was nothing new. In fact, it’s almost a verbatim regurgitating of several of what AronRa calls the foundational falsehoods of creationism. If you would like to see the various videos he has put together for these, you can go to his web site. Clearly, the idiot fundie did not.
I’m not going to bother addressing either his points in the original video or the piece below that gives a news-ish report-ish about his incredible journey but also features AronRa discussing the stupid. The debate has been done, and saying that evolution hasn’t been observed is kind of like saying “You don’t know the earth is round because you can’t see the whole thing”. It’s bloody stupid, and enough breath has been wasted on the topic.
I was reading a post just now on PZ’s blog entitled Nye/Ham postmorten: the apologists for religion and I agree wholeheartedly. I have toyed with writing a post on this topic for a while now, and this just sort of pushed me to get ‘er done. As ever, note that my job title is Business Analyst, which is a far cry from Evolutionary Biologist or Guy Who Reads The Bible. I am a layperson with no real expertise in evolutionary theory, but even a twit like me can see where evolution gets in the way of all systems of faith.
In PZ’s post, he references a post by Phil Plait trying to explain that evolution doesn’t say anything about where the breath of life came from, and therefore it really just takes over as a process from the moment life began, and that means it’s totally compatible with a faith-based way of thinking.
I knew this kid, Dan. He was a good kid. When we were younger, Dan brought a comic book to school. I don’t for the life of me remember what comic book it was, probably something super lame like Captain Canuck*, but I remember that it was autographed, and really special to Dan. He had it out at lunch that day, and by the time he got home from school, it had gone missing. Everyone remembered this other kid, Eric, going into the cloak room. Everyone remembered that Eric had commented on how cool the comic was. Everyone remembered that Eric’s family didn’t have the money to buy him comics. Everyone knew that Eric had stolen it. More importantly, Dan knew that Eric had stolen it.
Eric, of course, professed innocence. The thief had already had time to get the comic home, so bag checks and whatnot wouldn’t mean a thing. Dan knew he couldn’t do shit about it, so he just hated Eric and talked trash about him whenever he could. And we all agreed. Those who liked Eric (I was one of them) justified in our own minds the fact that he would do something like that for any number of reasons that we didn’t agree with, but we could understand. And we left it at that.
I will be the first to admit that I don’t have a normal emotional spectrum. It’s actually one of the things that freaked me out while reading The Psychopath Test by Jon Ronson. I have a shallow emotional spectrum, but that really is only one of many conditions that make a person a psychopath, and I’m free and clear on quite a few of them. Empathy is one of the things I find most interesting in this regard; I am far more empathic than I am emotional. When other people are sad, I can genuinely feel that for them, but it’s a hell of a lot harder for me to feel it for myself. I don’t know why. Kinda weird, I know.
Empathy is one of those higher functions that I suppose is part of the overall Social Animal thing. That’s not to say that all social animals experience empathy; I don’t want to imagine an ant listening to his buddy and saying, “Yeah, man, I get how awful that must have felt to watch your best friend get stepped on…” But I believe that empathy ties us together socially and helps make societies work.
I was poking through Pharyngula just now, and I saw this post (The last intelligent creationist) which discussed the origins of the objection to evolution that says, “If evolution is real, how come there are still monkeys?” It’s a question I’ve been asked before, and the first time I was asked this, I couldn’t help but feel deeply disheartened at the lack of thinking by the asker. But it has come up a few times, and I figured I’d take a few minutes to address it here.
In order to answer this, a few key things need to be understood about evolution. When you get two distinct groups of a thing, it comes from those two groups being geographically isolated from one another. If you have two identical groups of fish living in two different and separate environments, the process of evolution will ensure that they adapt differently given their unique environmental issues. Naturally selected mutations that would help ensure the survival of one of those groups of fish may be entirely detrimental to the other. Say, for example, that one of these two groups lives in clear water with bright pebbles on the bottom of the water source and the other lives in murky water with lots of algae and a general greeny-browny hue to everything. If camoflague were necessary for the survival of both groups of fish, then what works in one environment would not work in the other.
Outside my window I can see a lot of beautiful green trees, mountains, houses, roads, cars, and a few office buildings. These things are amazing to me. What’s more, I don’t need a creator for them to be amazing. I understand these things and they stand on their own two feet without some cosmic force to lend them awe.
Trees are fascinating to me. For starters, it always blows my top to think that we are, however distantly, related to them. All things began with the same primordial ooze in whatever form and function that took. The trees that I can see may all be green, but they are a myriad of shades of green, each tree having it’s own diversity of colors and textures. Trees evolved to handle different requirements.
Wow. Texas sometimes surprises me. After all the talk of changing curriculum to incorporate (among other things) the teaching of Creationism alongside evolution in the science class, the board voted unanimously to reject all of the changes put forward by Creationists and keep their core content focused on actual science. This is huge, although I do hold the same concerns that PZ Myers shares.
This is a big deal for those who are not familiar with the story because of the sheer size of Texas. There are so many Texan students that any proposed changes to their text books become changes to the standard. Publishing companies are not going to write different texts for each state depending upon their ideological lean. Thus, if Texas was to approve changes that would introduce Creationism into the curriculum in a formal way, as opposed to the current slight-of-hand way, it would be in textbooks (whether taught or not) in far more than just the hands of Texas teenagers.
[I regularly notice that one of the top search hits to this site is some variation on the theme of "evolution for kids". It just makes sense that I take a few moments and write a post or two on the topic and hopefully help out those parents who are searching for this information. My intended audience in this case isn't actually kids, it is parents trying to find ways to communicate with their kids. Hope it comes in handy! To see other entries, go here.]
Your body is made up of cells. They are really small, and each one contains a lot of stuff. One of the things they contain is called DNA, and that’s a really important thing. DNA is like an instruction manual for building you, and it gets put together when your mom and dad made you.
Last night (in utter contradiction to the previous night’s nerdy TV endeavor) I watched a science program that made me really interested and thoughtful on the topic. Ape Genius is a Nova program (you can watch it free on PBS’s web site) about the intelligence of some of our primate cousins. Most notably, it talked about the chimpanzees of Fongoli, Senegal who have taken to handcrafting spears for hunting bush babies. There was a lot more to the show and I highly recommend watching it.
What I loved most was where my mind went. The researchers kept essentially asking at what point do we consider culture to exist. These chimpanzees not only are using creative intelligence, but are sharing those discoveries and learning from one another. They are, to the best of our knowledge, the only chimpanzees utilizing spears and the only non-human animals in the world that have designed weapons for the purposes of hunting.