Yes, it’s true. NASA is going to blow up the moon. They cannot possibly understand the global ramifications of what they are planning, and we’re looking at something a million times worse than a nuclear winter, the tides will all completely cease, and women’s monthly cycles will take years to complete.
Please tell me, loyal readers, that you recognize sarcasm.
I’ve had a bunch of people tell me that they heard that NASA is going to blow up the moon, and they heard it from legit news sources. So naturally, they’re disgusted. I’ve had people ask me what right the Americans have to blow up the moon, I’ve had people ask how they’ll handle the billions of dollars in damages this will no doubt incur, and I’ve had people ask me if NASA has any idea that knocking the moon out of orbit is a bad thing.
I kid you not.
The whole point of this blog is to promote science and reason, and one of the major aspects in my mind is promoting the idea that you have to do the research before you can have an informed opinion. When I heard about this story, it made no sense to me. What possible benefit would NASA realize with such a plan? Rather than coming up with my own ill-informed theories about global domination of Americanism or how this proves that 911 was an inside job, I went to the source.
NASA has a very cool project underway called LCROSS, for Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite. As the mission overview explains, they’re trying to confirm the hypothesis that there is water ice in a permanently shadowed crater near one of the moon’s poles. The plan is to launch a Centaur rocket into the crater and follow it with a bunch of equipment that will collect and relay data about the debris plume.
Will this result in the moon being destroyed? No. In fact, out of curiosity I just did a quick google search and found this answer that says:
What we could do to get some number is compute the amount of energy that would be needed to stop the Moon dead in its tracks around the Earth. If this were to happen, it should theoretically fall and crash into the Earth. The energy needed to stop the Moon is equal to the kinetic energy of the Moon which is given by one half the mass times the velocity times the velocity. Now, the velocity of the Moon is 1022 meter per second. This is roughly equal to the maximum velocity of the SR-71 “Blackbird” spyplane7. Unlike the Blackbird, the Moon has a mass 7.3477?É‚Äî1022 kg. The total energy we need to generate is 3.8e28 J of energy. This is slightly less than 10 trillion megatonnes of TNT8.
And no, that’s not exact. It’s an oversimplification of the problem for sure (admitted by the author in the next paragraph), but it goes to show that we’re not at threat of doing this. Also, please understand that orbits are not static things. The moon was not always there and will not always be there. In fact, it’s not in the same where it was a year ago. So let’s chill out a little bit.
If they can find water ice on the moon, it means a lot of new possibilities for our very necessary next steps in space exploration. The moon could theoretically be a refuelling station, something that could change everything about how we interact with our solar system. This is huge.
That took next to no time to find out. But all those people who asked me those ridiculous questions didn’t go to that effort. This is what I find so frustrating these days. People allow their imaginations to run wild with absolutely no understanding of things. Their paranoia, already whipped into a frenzy by the Zeitgeist people, lashes out whenever they see something they don’t understand.
Of course, I’m preaching to the choir. You’re on this site because you’re interested in science and reason presumably. But the choir’s important too. My parents sing in one at their church and they call it their ministry of music. So maybe we need to steal that thought, choir. Go forth and share the message of rationalism. When your friends come to you with this ridiculous stuff, maybe the answer is that we need to sit them down and show them how we determine what’s real and what’s not.
Jim